This article from the New York Times outlines why it is that the cheapest foods to come by are the worst ones for us. It further points out how the whole system is rigged so that in order to eat better, you would have to spend a lot more money to do so than someone on a tighter budget. Walk into any supermarket and you can see first hand exactly what he is talking about in the article.
My own journey to replace processed foods with wholesome foods made from scratch definitely puts quite a pinch in my wallet. It leaves me with a difficult dilemma: should I spend less, get more food, but risk my health in the long run or should I spend more, get less food, and increase my chances for better health over time? If money were no object, then the choice would be easy but this is not the case for me and for many others in the same situation. The points made in the article certainly make good food for thought.






